Apply suggestions from code review
Signed-off-by: Patrik Oldsberg <poldsberg@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -105,11 +105,11 @@ Although there are other options, like externalizing dependencies, the module fe
|
||||
|
||||
There are multiple available implementations of module federation.
|
||||
|
||||
Historically, module federation was implemented as a [Webpack feature](https://webpack.js.org/). Since then, additional implementations were created. Mainly for [Rspack](https://www.rspack.dev/) and [Vite](https://github.com/originjs/vite-plugin-federation).
|
||||
Historically, module federation was implemented as a [Webpack feature](https://webpack.js.org/). Since then, additional implementations were created. Mainly for [`rspack`](https://www.rspack.dev/) and [Vite](https://github.com/originjs/vite-plugin-federation).
|
||||
|
||||
Recent changes _claim_, that all of these module federation implementations should be compatible with each other and there should be no need for locking backstage into a single implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
Compatibility between Webpack and Rspack should available via the [@module-federation/enhanced](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@module-federation/enhanced) package. The compatibility is further [described here](https://www.rspack.dev/blog/module-federation-added-to-rspack.html#introducing-rspack-050).
|
||||
Compatibility between Webpack and `rspack` should available via the [@module-federation/enhanced](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@module-federation/enhanced) package. The compatibility is further [described here](https://www.rspack.dev/blog/module-federation-added-to-rspack.html#introducing-rspack-050).
|
||||
|
||||
The Vite plugin claims webpack compatibility as well. The Vite plugin _is not part of the @module-federation_ organization. The extend of compatibility is at this time unknown.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user