diff --git a/beps/0002-dynamic-frontend-plugins/README.md b/beps/0002-dynamic-frontend-plugins/README.md
index 0fd42d389f..b44c4a8b20 100644
--- a/beps/0002-dynamic-frontend-plugins/README.md
+++ b/beps/0002-dynamic-frontend-plugins/README.md
@@ -105,11 +105,11 @@ Although there are other options, like externalizing dependencies, the module fe
 
 There are multiple available implementations of module federation.
 
-Historically, module federation was implemented as a [Webpack feature](https://webpack.js.org/). Since then, additional implementations were created. Mainly for [Rspack](https://www.rspack.dev/) and [Vite](https://github.com/originjs/vite-plugin-federation).
+Historically, module federation was implemented as a [Webpack feature](https://webpack.js.org/). Since then, additional implementations were created. Mainly for [`rspack`](https://www.rspack.dev/) and [Vite](https://github.com/originjs/vite-plugin-federation).
 
 Recent changes _claim_, that all of these module federation implementations should be compatible with each other and there should be no need for locking backstage into a single implementation.
 
-Compatibility between Webpack and Rspack should available via the [@module-federation/enhanced](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@module-federation/enhanced) package. The compatibility is further [described here](https://www.rspack.dev/blog/module-federation-added-to-rspack.html#introducing-rspack-050).
+Compatibility between Webpack and `rspack` should available via the [@module-federation/enhanced](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@module-federation/enhanced) package. The compatibility is further [described here](https://www.rspack.dev/blog/module-federation-added-to-rspack.html#introducing-rspack-050).
 
 The Vite plugin claims webpack compatibility as well. The Vite plugin _is not part of the @module-federation_ organization. The extend of compatibility is at this time unknown.