Document the service catalog (#1922)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ better yet, a pull request.
|
||||
- [Overview](features/software-catalog/index.md)
|
||||
- [System model](features/software-catalog/system-model.md)
|
||||
- [YAML File Format](features/software-catalog/descriptor-format.md)
|
||||
- [Populating the catalog](features/software-catalog/populating.md)
|
||||
- [Extending the model](features/software-catalog/extending-the-model.md)
|
||||
- [External integrations](features/software-catalog/external-integrations.md)
|
||||
- [API](features/software-catalog/api.md)
|
||||
|
||||
Binary file not shown.
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 45 KiB |
Binary file not shown.
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 8.6 KiB |
Binary file not shown.
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 414 KiB |
Binary file not shown.
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 234 KiB |
Binary file not shown.
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 45 KiB |
Binary file not shown.
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 54 KiB |
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
# Extending the model
|
||||
|
||||
Backstage natively supports tracking of the following component
|
||||
[`type`](descriptor-format.md)'s:
|
||||
|
||||
- Services
|
||||
- Websites
|
||||
- Libraries
|
||||
- Documentation
|
||||
- Other
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
Since these types are likely not the only kind of software you will want to
|
||||
track in Backstage, it is possible to
|
||||
|
||||
It is possible to add your own software types that fits your organization's data
|
||||
model. Inside Spotify our model has grown significantly over the years, and now
|
||||
includes ML models, Apps, data pipelines and many more.
|
||||
|
||||
## Adding a new type
|
||||
|
||||
TODO: Describe what changes are needed to add a new type that shows up in the
|
||||
catalog.
|
||||
|
||||
## The Other type
|
||||
|
||||
It might be tempting to put software that doesn't fit into any of the existing
|
||||
types into Other. There are a few reasons why we advice against this; firstly,
|
||||
we have found that it is preferred to match the conceptual model that your
|
||||
engineers have when describing your sofware. Secondly, Backstage helps your
|
||||
engineers manage their software by integrating the infratrucure tooling through
|
||||
plugins. Different plugins are used for managing different types of components.
|
||||
|
||||
For example, the
|
||||
[Lighthouse plugin](https://github.com/spotify/backstage/tree/master/plugins/lighthouse)
|
||||
only makes sense for Websites. The more specific you can be in how you model
|
||||
your software, the easier it is to provide plugins that are contextual.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
|
||||
# External integrations
|
||||
|
||||
Backstage natively supports storing software components in
|
||||
[metadata YAML files](descriptor-format.md). However, companies that already
|
||||
have an existing system for keeping track of software and its owners can
|
||||
integrate such systems with Backstage.
|
||||
|
||||
TODO: Describe the API contract.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -6,25 +6,109 @@ The Backstage Service Catalog — actually, a software catalog, since it include
|
||||
more than just services — is a centralized system that keeps track of ownership
|
||||
and metadata for all the software in your ecosystem (services, websites,
|
||||
libraries, data pipelines, etc). The catalog is built around the concept of
|
||||
[metadata yaml files](../../architecture-decisions/adr002-default-catalog-file-format.md#format)
|
||||
stored together with the code, which are then harvested and visualized in
|
||||
Backstage.
|
||||
[metadata YAML files](descriptor-format.md) stored together with the code, which
|
||||
are then harvested and visualized in Backstage.
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
We have also found that the service catalog is a great way to organise the
|
||||
infrastructure tools you use to manage the software as well. This is how
|
||||
Backstage creates one developer portal for all your tools. Rather than asking
|
||||
teams to jump between different infrastructure UI’s (and incurring additional
|
||||
cognitive overhead each time they make a context switch), most of these tools
|
||||
can be organised around the entities in the catalog.
|
||||
## How it works
|
||||
|
||||
## Using the Service Catalog
|
||||
Backstage and the Backstage Service Catalog makes it easy for one team to manage
|
||||
10 services — and makes it possible for your company to manage thousands of
|
||||
them.
|
||||
|
||||
TODO
|
||||
More specifically, the Service Catalog enables two main use-cases:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Helping teams manage and maintain the software they own. Teams get a uniform
|
||||
view of all their software; services, libraries, websites, ML models — you
|
||||
name it, Backstage knows all about it.
|
||||
2. Makes all the software in your company, and who owns it, discoverable. No
|
||||
more orphan software hiding in the dark corners of your software ecosystem.
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
## Adding components to the catalog
|
||||
|
||||
The source of truth for the components in your service catalog are
|
||||
[metadata YAML files](descriptor-format.md) stored in source control (GitHub,
|
||||
GitHub Enterprise, GitLab, ...).
|
||||
|
||||
There are 3 ways to add components to the catalog:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Manually register components
|
||||
2. Creating new components through Backstage
|
||||
3. Integrating with and [external source](external-integrations.md)
|
||||
|
||||
### Manually register components
|
||||
|
||||
Users can register new components by going to `/create` and clicking the
|
||||
**REGSITER EXISTING COMPONENT** button:
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
Backstage expects the full URL to the YAML in your source control. Example:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
https://github.com/spotify/backstage/blob/master/packages/catalog-model/examples/artist-lookup-component.yaml
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
_More examples can be found
|
||||
[here](https://github.com/spotify/backstage/tree/master/packages/catalog-model/examples)._
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
It is important to note that any kind of software can be registered in
|
||||
Backstage. Even if the software is not maintained by your company (SaaS
|
||||
offering, for example) it is still useful to create components for tracking
|
||||
ownership.
|
||||
|
||||
### Creating new components through Backstage
|
||||
|
||||
All software created through the
|
||||
[Backstage Software Templates](../software-templates/index.md) are automatically
|
||||
registered in the catalog.
|
||||
|
||||
### Updating component metadata
|
||||
|
||||
Teams owning the components are responsible for maintaining the metadata about
|
||||
them, and do so using their normal Git workflow.
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
Once the change has been merged, Backstage will automatically show the updated
|
||||
metadata in the service catalog after a short while.
|
||||
|
||||
## Finding software in the catlog
|
||||
|
||||
By default the service catalog shows components owned by the team of the logged
|
||||
in user. But you can also switch to _All_ to see all the components across your
|
||||
companie's software ecosystem. Basic inline _search_ and _column filtering_
|
||||
makes it easy to browse a big set of components.
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
## Starring components
|
||||
|
||||
For easy and quick access to components you visit frequently, Backstage supports
|
||||
_starring_ of components:
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
## Integrated tooling through plugins
|
||||
|
||||
The service catalog is a great way to organise the infrastructure tools you use
|
||||
to manage the software. This is how Backstage creates one developer portal for
|
||||
all your tools. Rather than asking teams to jump between different
|
||||
infrastructure UI’s (and incurring additional cognitive overhead each time they
|
||||
make a context switch), most of these tools can be organised around the entities
|
||||
in the catalog.
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
The Backstage platform can be customized by incorporating
|
||||
[existing open source plugins](https://github.com/spotify/backstage/tree/master/plugins),
|
||||
or by [building your own](../../plugins/index.md).
|
||||
|
||||
## Links
|
||||
|
||||
- [[Blog post] Backstage Service Catalog released in alpha](https://backstage.io/blog/2020/06/22/backstage-service-catalog-alpha)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
|
||||
# Backstage System Model
|
||||
|
||||
We believe that a strong shared understanding and terminology around systems,
|
||||
software and resources leads to a better Backstage experience.
|
||||
|
||||
_This description originates from
|
||||
[this RFC](https://github.com/spotify/backstage/issues/390). Note that some of
|
||||
the concpets are not yet supported in Backstage._
|
||||
|
||||
## Concepts
|
||||
|
||||
We model our technology using these five concepts (further explained below):
|
||||
|
||||
- **Domains** are a high-level grouping of systems
|
||||
- **Systems** encapsulate the implementation of APIs
|
||||
- **APIs** are the boundaries between different components and systems
|
||||
- **Components** are pieces of software
|
||||
- **Resources** are physical or virtual infrastructure needed to operate a
|
||||
system
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
### Domain
|
||||
|
||||
While systems are the basic level of encapsulation for resources, components and
|
||||
APIs, it is often useful to group a collection of systems that share
|
||||
terminology, domain models, business purpose, or documentation, i.e. they form a
|
||||
bounded context.
|
||||
|
||||
For example, it would make sense if the different systems in the “Payments”
|
||||
domain would come with some documentation on how to accept payments for a new
|
||||
product or use-case, share the same entity types in their APIs, and integrate
|
||||
well with each other.
|
||||
|
||||
### System
|
||||
|
||||
With increasing complexity in software, we believe that systems form an
|
||||
important abstraction level to help us reason about software ecosystems. Systems
|
||||
are a useful concept in that they allow us to ignore the implementation details
|
||||
of a certain functionality for consumers, while allowing the owning team to make
|
||||
changes as they see fit (leading to low coupling).
|
||||
|
||||
A system, in this sense, is a collection of resources and components that
|
||||
exposes one or several APIs. Components and resources in a system are typically
|
||||
owned by the same team and are expected to co-evolve. As such, systems usually
|
||||
consist of at most a handful of components.
|
||||
|
||||
For example, a playlist management system might encapsulate a backend service to
|
||||
update playlists, a backend service to query them, and a database to store them.
|
||||
It could expose an RPC API, a daily snapshots dataset, and an event stream of
|
||||
playlist updates.
|
||||
|
||||
### Component
|
||||
|
||||
A component is a piece of software, for example a mobile feature, web site,
|
||||
backend service or data pipeline (list not exhaustive). A component can be
|
||||
tracked in source control, or use some existing open source or commercial
|
||||
software.
|
||||
|
||||
A component can implement APIs for other components to consume. It might depend
|
||||
on the resources of the system it belongs to, and APIs from other components or
|
||||
other systems. All other aspects of the component, e.g. any code dependencies,
|
||||
must be encapsulated.
|
||||
|
||||
### API
|
||||
|
||||
We believe APIs form an important (maybe the most important) abstraction that
|
||||
allows large software ecosystems to scale. Thus, APIs are a first class citizen
|
||||
in the Backstage model and the primary way to discover existing functionality in
|
||||
the ecosystem.
|
||||
|
||||
APIs are implemented by components and form boundaries between components and
|
||||
systems. They might be defined using an RPC IDL (eg Protobuf, GraphQL, ...), a
|
||||
data schema (eg Avro, TFRecord, ...), or as code interfaces. In any case, APIs
|
||||
exposed by components need to be in a known machine-readable format so we can
|
||||
build further tooling and analysis on top.
|
||||
|
||||
Some APIs might be exposed by the system, making them available for any other
|
||||
Spotify component to consume. Those public APIs must be documented and humanly
|
||||
discoverable in Backstage.
|
||||
|
||||
### Resource
|
||||
|
||||
Resources are the infrastructure a system needs to operate, like BigTable
|
||||
databases, Pub/Sub topics, S3 buckets or CDNs. Modelling them together with
|
||||
components and systems will better allow us to visualize resource footprint, and
|
||||
create tooling around them.
|
||||
|
||||
## Current status
|
||||
|
||||
Backstage currently supports Components and APIs.
|
||||
|
||||
## Links
|
||||
|
||||
- [Original RFC](https://github.com/spotify/backstage/issues/390)
|
||||
- [YAML file format](../../architecture-decisions/adr002-default-catalog-file-format.md)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,6 +5,10 @@ Components inside Backstage. It by default has the ability to load skeletons of
|
||||
code, template in some variables and then publish the template to some location
|
||||
like GitHub.
|
||||
|
||||
<video width="100%" height="100%" controls>
|
||||
<source src="https://backstage.io/blog/assets/2020-08-05/feature.mp4" type="video/mp4">
|
||||
</video>
|
||||
|
||||
### Getting Started
|
||||
|
||||
The Software Templates are available under `/create`, and if you've followed
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@ nav:
|
||||
- Overview: 'features/software-catalog/index.md'
|
||||
- System model: 'features/software-catalog/system-model.md'
|
||||
- YAML File Format: 'features/software-catalog/descriptor-format.md'
|
||||
- Populating the catalog: 'features/software-catalog/populating.md'
|
||||
- Extending the model: 'features/software-catalog/extending-the-model.md'
|
||||
- External integrations: 'features/software-catalog/external-integrations.md'
|
||||
- API: 'features/software-catalog/api.md'
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user