make the act() expecting test more robust to variations, and fix missing await

Signed-off-by: Fredrik Adelöw <freben@gmail.com>

packages/test-utils/src/testUtils/appWrappers.test.tsx

@@ -48,14 +48,13 @@ describe('wrapInTestApp', () => {
       await Promise.resolve();
     });
 
-    expect(error).toEqual([
-      expect.stringMatching(
-        /^Warning: An update to %s inside a test was not wrapped in act\(...\)/,
+    expect(
+      error.some(e =>
+        e.includes(
+          'Warning: An update to %s inside a test was not wrapped in act(...)',
+        ),
       ),
-      expect.stringMatching(
-        /^Warning: An update to %s inside a test was not wrapped in act\(...\)/,
-      ),
-    ]);
+    ).toBeTruthy();
   });
 
   it('should render a component in a test app without warning about missing act()', async () => {

plugins/xcmetrics/src/components/Trend/Trend.test.tsx

@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ describe('Trend', () => {
     const rendered = await renderInTestApp(
       <Trend data={data} title={title} color="#000" />,
     );
-    expect(rendered.findAllByText('testTitle')).toBeTruthy();
+    expect(await rendered.findAllByText('testTitle')).toBeTruthy();
   });
 
   it('should render empty state', async () => {
@@ -32,6 +32,6 @@ describe('Trend', () => {
     const rendered = await renderInTestApp(
       <Trend title={title} color="#000" />,
     );
-    expect(rendered.findAllByText('testTitle')).toBeTruthy();
+    expect(await rendered.findAllByText('testTitle')).toBeTruthy();
   });
 });