@@ -74,11 +74,11 @@ Inclusive of the initial RFC there's been a swarm of issues that are requesting
|
||||
|
||||
See the following:
|
||||
|
||||
- https://github.com/backstage/backstage/issues/16275
|
||||
- https://github.com/backstage/backstage/pull/23283
|
||||
- https://github.com/backstage/backstage/issues/19597
|
||||
- https://github.com/backstage/backstage/issues/20533
|
||||
- https://github.com/backstage/backstage/pull/17746
|
||||
- [ ] https://github.com/backstage/backstage/issues/16275
|
||||
- [ ] https://github.com/backstage/backstage/pull/23283
|
||||
- [ ] https://github.com/backstage/backstage/issues/19597
|
||||
- [ ] https://github.com/backstage/backstage/issues/20533
|
||||
- [ ] https://github.com/backstage/backstage/pull/17746
|
||||
|
||||
There's some ideas for introducing a templating syntax for both templating into the `parameters` schema, and also being able to pass through some templating strings to underlying field extensions that can use those templating strings.
|
||||
We want to align here so that we're not going to have those conflict or compete, and create a standard for how to achieve templating in both circumstances.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user