Merge pull request #7634 from backstage/rugvip/filters
config-loader: apply visibility filter to configuration schema validation errors
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
'@backstage/config-loader': patch
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Configuration schema errors are now filtered using the provided visibility option. This means that schema errors due to missing backend configuration will no longer break frontend builds.
|
||||
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
|
||||
"fs-extra": "9.1.0",
|
||||
"json-schema": "^0.3.0",
|
||||
"json-schema-merge-allof": "^0.8.1",
|
||||
"json-schema-traverse": "^1.0.0",
|
||||
"typescript-json-schema": "^0.50.1",
|
||||
"yaml": "^1.9.2",
|
||||
"yup": "^0.32.9"
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -29,12 +29,30 @@ describe('compileConfigSchemas', () => {
|
||||
},
|
||||
]);
|
||||
expect(validate([{ data: { a: 1 }, context: 'test' }])).toEqual({
|
||||
errors: ['Config should be string { type=string } at /a'],
|
||||
visibilityByPath: new Map(),
|
||||
errors: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
keyword: 'type',
|
||||
dataPath: '/a',
|
||||
schemaPath: '#/properties/a/type',
|
||||
message: 'should be string',
|
||||
params: { type: 'string' },
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
visibilityByDataPath: new Map(),
|
||||
visibilityBySchemaPath: new Map(),
|
||||
});
|
||||
expect(validate([{ data: { b: 'b' }, context: 'test' }])).toEqual({
|
||||
errors: ['Config should be number { type=number } at /b'],
|
||||
visibilityByPath: new Map(),
|
||||
errors: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
keyword: 'type',
|
||||
dataPath: '/b',
|
||||
schemaPath: '#/properties/b/type',
|
||||
message: 'should be number',
|
||||
params: { type: 'number' },
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
visibilityByDataPath: new Map(),
|
||||
visibilityBySchemaPath: new Map(),
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -78,7 +96,7 @@ describe('compileConfigSchemas', () => {
|
||||
{ data: { a: 'a', b: 'b', c: 'c', d: ['d'] }, context: 'test' },
|
||||
]),
|
||||
).toEqual({
|
||||
visibilityByPath: new Map(
|
||||
visibilityByDataPath: new Map(
|
||||
Object.entries({
|
||||
'/a': 'frontend',
|
||||
'/b': 'secret',
|
||||
@@ -86,6 +104,14 @@ describe('compileConfigSchemas', () => {
|
||||
'/d/0': 'frontend',
|
||||
}),
|
||||
),
|
||||
visibilityBySchemaPath: new Map(
|
||||
Object.entries({
|
||||
'/properties/a': 'frontend',
|
||||
'/properties/b': 'secret',
|
||||
'/properties/d': 'secret',
|
||||
'/properties/d/items': 'frontend',
|
||||
}),
|
||||
),
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
|
||||
import Ajv from 'ajv';
|
||||
import { JSONSchema7 as JSONSchema } from 'json-schema';
|
||||
import mergeAllOf, { Resolvers } from 'json-schema-merge-allof';
|
||||
import traverse from 'json-schema-traverse';
|
||||
import { ConfigReader } from '@backstage/config';
|
||||
import {
|
||||
ConfigSchemaPackageEntry,
|
||||
@@ -38,7 +39,7 @@ export function compileConfigSchemas(
|
||||
// The ajv instance below is stateful and doesn't really allow for additional
|
||||
// output during validation. We work around this by having this extra piece
|
||||
// of state that we reset before each validation.
|
||||
const visibilityByPath = new Map<string, ConfigVisibility>();
|
||||
const visibilityByDataPath = new Map<string, ConfigVisibility>();
|
||||
|
||||
const ajv = new Ajv({
|
||||
allErrors: true,
|
||||
@@ -62,7 +63,7 @@ export function compileConfigSchemas(
|
||||
/\['?(.*?)'?\]/g,
|
||||
(_, segment) => `/${segment}`,
|
||||
);
|
||||
visibilityByPath.set(normalizedPath, visibility);
|
||||
visibilityByDataPath.set(normalizedPath, visibility);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
};
|
||||
@@ -80,27 +81,30 @@ export function compileConfigSchemas(
|
||||
const merged = mergeConfigSchemas(schemas.map(_ => _.value));
|
||||
const validate = ajv.compile(merged);
|
||||
|
||||
const visibilityBySchemaPath = new Map<string, ConfigVisibility>();
|
||||
traverse(merged, (schema, path) => {
|
||||
if (schema.visibility && schema.visibility !== 'backend') {
|
||||
visibilityBySchemaPath.set(path, schema.visibility);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
return configs => {
|
||||
const config = ConfigReader.fromConfigs(configs).get();
|
||||
|
||||
visibilityByPath.clear();
|
||||
visibilityByDataPath.clear();
|
||||
|
||||
const valid = validate(config);
|
||||
if (!valid) {
|
||||
const errors = validate.errors ?? [];
|
||||
return {
|
||||
errors: errors.map(({ dataPath, message, params }) => {
|
||||
const paramStr = Object.entries(params)
|
||||
.map(([name, value]) => `${name}=${value}`)
|
||||
.join(' ');
|
||||
return `Config ${message || ''} { ${paramStr} } at ${dataPath}`;
|
||||
}),
|
||||
visibilityByPath: new Map(),
|
||||
errors: validate.errors ?? [],
|
||||
visibilityByDataPath: new Map(visibilityByDataPath),
|
||||
visibilityBySchemaPath,
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
visibilityByPath: new Map(visibilityByPath),
|
||||
visibilityByDataPath: new Map(visibilityByDataPath),
|
||||
visibilityBySchemaPath,
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
import { JsonObject } from '@backstage/config';
|
||||
import { ConfigVisibility } from './types';
|
||||
import { filterByVisibility } from './filtering';
|
||||
import { filterByVisibility, filterErrorsByVisibility } from './filtering';
|
||||
|
||||
const data = {
|
||||
arr: ['f', 'b', 's'],
|
||||
@@ -175,3 +175,195 @@ describe('filterByVisibility', () => {
|
||||
).toEqual(expected);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
describe('filterErrorsByVisibility', () => {
|
||||
it('should allow empty input', () => {
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
filterErrorsByVisibility(undefined, ['frontend'], new Map(), new Map()),
|
||||
).toEqual([]);
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
filterErrorsByVisibility(
|
||||
['my-error' as any],
|
||||
undefined,
|
||||
new Map(),
|
||||
new Map(),
|
||||
),
|
||||
).toEqual(['my-error']);
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
filterErrorsByVisibility([], ['frontend'], new Map(), new Map()),
|
||||
).toEqual([]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('should filter generic errors', () => {
|
||||
const errors = [
|
||||
{
|
||||
keyword: 'something',
|
||||
dataPath: '/a',
|
||||
schemaPath: '#/properties/a/something',
|
||||
params: {},
|
||||
message: 'a',
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
keyword: 'something',
|
||||
dataPath: '/b',
|
||||
schemaPath: '#/properties/b/something',
|
||||
params: {},
|
||||
message: 'b',
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
keyword: 'something',
|
||||
dataPath: '/c',
|
||||
schemaPath: '#/properties/c/something',
|
||||
params: {},
|
||||
message: 'c',
|
||||
},
|
||||
];
|
||||
const visibilityByDataPath = new Map<string, ConfigVisibility>([
|
||||
['/a', 'frontend'],
|
||||
['/c', 'secret'],
|
||||
]);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
filterErrorsByVisibility(
|
||||
errors,
|
||||
undefined,
|
||||
visibilityByDataPath,
|
||||
new Map(),
|
||||
),
|
||||
).toEqual([
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({ message: 'a' }),
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({ message: 'b' }),
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({ message: 'c' }),
|
||||
]);
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
filterErrorsByVisibility(
|
||||
errors,
|
||||
['frontend'],
|
||||
visibilityByDataPath,
|
||||
new Map(),
|
||||
),
|
||||
).toEqual([expect.objectContaining({ message: 'a' })]);
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
filterErrorsByVisibility(
|
||||
errors,
|
||||
['backend'],
|
||||
visibilityByDataPath,
|
||||
new Map(),
|
||||
),
|
||||
).toEqual([expect.objectContaining({ message: 'b' })]);
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
filterErrorsByVisibility(
|
||||
errors,
|
||||
['secret'],
|
||||
visibilityByDataPath,
|
||||
new Map(),
|
||||
),
|
||||
).toEqual([expect.objectContaining({ message: 'c' })]);
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
filterErrorsByVisibility(errors, [], visibilityByDataPath, new Map()),
|
||||
).toEqual([]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('should always forward structural type errors', () => {
|
||||
const errors = [
|
||||
{
|
||||
keyword: 'type',
|
||||
dataPath: '/a',
|
||||
schemaPath: '#/properties/a/type',
|
||||
params: { type: 'number' },
|
||||
message: 'a',
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
keyword: 'type',
|
||||
dataPath: '/b',
|
||||
schemaPath: '#/properties/b/type',
|
||||
params: { type: 'string' },
|
||||
message: 'b',
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
keyword: 'type',
|
||||
dataPath: '/c',
|
||||
schemaPath: '#/properties/c/type',
|
||||
params: { type: 'array' },
|
||||
message: 'c',
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
keyword: 'type',
|
||||
dataPath: '/c',
|
||||
schemaPath: '#/properties/c/type',
|
||||
params: { type: 'object' },
|
||||
message: 'd',
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
keyword: 'type',
|
||||
dataPath: '/c',
|
||||
schemaPath: '#/properties/c/type',
|
||||
params: { type: 'null' },
|
||||
message: 'e',
|
||||
},
|
||||
];
|
||||
const visibilityByDataPath = new Map<string, ConfigVisibility>([
|
||||
['/a', 'secret'],
|
||||
['/b', 'secret'],
|
||||
['/c', 'secret'],
|
||||
['/d', 'secret'],
|
||||
['/e', 'secret'],
|
||||
]);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
filterErrorsByVisibility(
|
||||
errors,
|
||||
['frontend'],
|
||||
visibilityByDataPath,
|
||||
new Map(),
|
||||
),
|
||||
).toEqual([
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({ message: 'c' }),
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({ message: 'd' }),
|
||||
]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('should filter requirement errors based on schema path', () => {
|
||||
const errors = [
|
||||
{
|
||||
keyword: 'required',
|
||||
dataPath: '/a',
|
||||
schemaPath: '#/properties/o/required',
|
||||
params: { missingProperty: 'a' },
|
||||
message: 'a',
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
keyword: 'required',
|
||||
dataPath: '/b',
|
||||
schemaPath: '#/properties/o/required',
|
||||
params: { missingProperty: 'b' },
|
||||
message: 'b',
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
keyword: 'required',
|
||||
dataPath: '/c',
|
||||
schemaPath: '#/properties/o/required',
|
||||
params: { missingProperty: 'c' },
|
||||
message: 'c',
|
||||
},
|
||||
];
|
||||
const visibilityBySchemaPath = new Map<string, ConfigVisibility>([
|
||||
['/properties/o', 'secret'],
|
||||
['/properties/o/properties/a', 'frontend'],
|
||||
['/properties/o/properties/b', 'secret'],
|
||||
['/properties/o/properties/c/properties/x', 'frontend'],
|
||||
]);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
filterErrorsByVisibility(
|
||||
errors,
|
||||
['frontend'],
|
||||
new Map(),
|
||||
visibilityBySchemaPath,
|
||||
),
|
||||
).toEqual([
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({ message: 'a' }),
|
||||
expect.objectContaining({ message: 'c' }),
|
||||
]);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ import {
|
||||
ConfigVisibility,
|
||||
DEFAULT_CONFIG_VISIBILITY,
|
||||
TransformFunc,
|
||||
ValidationError,
|
||||
} from './types';
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@@ -28,7 +29,7 @@ import {
|
||||
export function filterByVisibility(
|
||||
data: JsonObject,
|
||||
includeVisibilities: ConfigVisibility[],
|
||||
visibilityByPath: Map<string, ConfigVisibility>,
|
||||
visibilityByDataPath: Map<string, ConfigVisibility>,
|
||||
transformFunc?: TransformFunc<number | string | boolean>,
|
||||
withFilteredKeys?: boolean,
|
||||
): { data: JsonObject; filteredKeys?: string[] } {
|
||||
@@ -40,7 +41,7 @@ export function filterByVisibility(
|
||||
filterPath: string, // Matches the format of the ConfigReader
|
||||
): JsonValue | undefined {
|
||||
const visibility =
|
||||
visibilityByPath.get(visibilityPath) ?? DEFAULT_CONFIG_VISIBILITY;
|
||||
visibilityByDataPath.get(visibilityPath) ?? DEFAULT_CONFIG_VISIBILITY;
|
||||
const isVisible = includeVisibilities.includes(visibility);
|
||||
|
||||
if (typeof jsonVal !== 'object') {
|
||||
@@ -105,3 +106,54 @@ export function filterByVisibility(
|
||||
data: (transform(data, '', '') as JsonObject) ?? {},
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
export function filterErrorsByVisibility(
|
||||
errors: ValidationError[] | undefined,
|
||||
includeVisibilities: ConfigVisibility[] | undefined,
|
||||
visibilityByDataPath: Map<string, ConfigVisibility>,
|
||||
visibilityBySchemaPath: Map<string, ConfigVisibility>,
|
||||
): ValidationError[] {
|
||||
if (!errors) {
|
||||
return [];
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!includeVisibilities) {
|
||||
return errors;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const visibleSchemaPaths = Array.from(visibilityBySchemaPath)
|
||||
.filter(([, v]) => includeVisibilities.includes(v))
|
||||
.map(([k]) => k);
|
||||
|
||||
// If we're filtering by visibility we only care about the errors that happened
|
||||
// in a visible path.
|
||||
return errors.filter(error => {
|
||||
// We always include structural errors as we don't know whether there are
|
||||
// any visible paths within the structures.
|
||||
if (
|
||||
error.keyword === 'type' &&
|
||||
['object', 'array'].includes(error.params.type)
|
||||
) {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// For fields that were required we use the schema path to determine whether
|
||||
// it was visible in addition to the data path. This is because the data path
|
||||
// visibilities are only populated for values that we reached, which we won't
|
||||
// if the value is missing.
|
||||
// We don't use this method for all the errors as the data path is more robust
|
||||
// and doesn't require us to properly trim the schema path.
|
||||
if (error.keyword === 'required') {
|
||||
const trimmedPath = error.schemaPath.slice(1, -'/required'.length);
|
||||
const fullPath = `${trimmedPath}/properties/${error.params.missingProperty}`;
|
||||
if (
|
||||
visibleSchemaPaths.some(visiblePath => visiblePath.startsWith(fullPath))
|
||||
) {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const vis =
|
||||
visibilityByDataPath.get(error.dataPath) ?? DEFAULT_CONFIG_VISIBILITY;
|
||||
return vis && includeVisibilities.includes(vis);
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -102,4 +102,146 @@ describe('loadConfigSchema', () => {
|
||||
'Serialized configuration schema is invalid or has an invalid version number',
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
describe('should consider schema', () => {
|
||||
it('when filtering simple config', async () => {
|
||||
mockFs({
|
||||
'package.json': JSON.stringify({
|
||||
name: 'a',
|
||||
configSchema: {
|
||||
type: 'object',
|
||||
properties: {
|
||||
key1: { type: 'string', visibility: 'frontend' },
|
||||
key2: { type: 'number', visibility: 'secret' },
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
}),
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const schema = await loadConfigSchema({
|
||||
packagePaths: ['package.json'],
|
||||
dependencies: [],
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const configs = [
|
||||
{ data: { key1: 'a', key2: 'not-a-number' }, context: 'test' },
|
||||
];
|
||||
|
||||
expect(() => schema.process(configs)).toThrow(
|
||||
'Config validation failed, Config should be number { type=number } at /key2',
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(schema.process(configs, { visibility: ['frontend'] })).toEqual([
|
||||
{ data: { key1: 'a' }, context: 'test' },
|
||||
]);
|
||||
expect(() => schema.process(configs, { visibility: ['secret'] })).toThrow(
|
||||
'Config validation failed, Config should be number { type=number } at /key2',
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('when filtering nested config', async () => {
|
||||
mockFs({
|
||||
'package.json': JSON.stringify({
|
||||
name: 'a',
|
||||
configSchema: {
|
||||
type: 'object',
|
||||
properties: {
|
||||
nested: {
|
||||
allOf: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
type: 'array',
|
||||
items: {
|
||||
type: 'object',
|
||||
visibility: 'frontend',
|
||||
properties: {
|
||||
x: { type: 'number' },
|
||||
},
|
||||
additionalProperties: {
|
||||
visibility: 'frontend',
|
||||
type: 'string',
|
||||
pattern: '^...$',
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
}),
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const schema = await loadConfigSchema({
|
||||
packagePaths: ['package.json'],
|
||||
dependencies: [],
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const mkConfig = (nested: any) => [
|
||||
{ data: { nested: [nested] }, context: 'test' },
|
||||
];
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
schema.process(mkConfig({ x: 1 }), { visibility: ['frontend'] }),
|
||||
).toEqual([{ data: { nested: [{}] }, context: 'test' }]);
|
||||
expect(() => schema.process(mkConfig({ y: 1 }))).toThrow(
|
||||
'Config validation failed, Config should be string { type=string } at /nested/0/y',
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(() =>
|
||||
schema.process(mkConfig({ y: 1 }), { visibility: ['frontend'] }),
|
||||
).toThrow(
|
||||
'Config validation failed, Config should be string { type=string } at /nested/0/y',
|
||||
);
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
schema.process(mkConfig({ x: 'a' }), { visibility: ['frontend'] }),
|
||||
).toEqual([{ data: { nested: [{}] }, context: 'test' }]);
|
||||
expect(
|
||||
schema.process(mkConfig({ y: 'aaa' }), { visibility: ['frontend'] }),
|
||||
).toEqual([{ data: { nested: [{ y: 'aaa' }] }, context: 'test' }]);
|
||||
expect(() =>
|
||||
schema.process(mkConfig({ y: 'aaaa' }), { visibility: ['frontend'] }),
|
||||
).toThrow(
|
||||
'Config validation failed, Config should match pattern "^...$" { pattern=^...$ } at /nested/0/y',
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// This is a bit of an edge case where we have a structural error, these should always be reported
|
||||
expect(() =>
|
||||
schema.process([{ data: { nested: {} }, context: 'test' }], {
|
||||
visibility: ['frontend'],
|
||||
}),
|
||||
).toThrow(
|
||||
'Config validation failed, Config should be array { type=array } at /nested',
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('when filtering config with required values', async () => {
|
||||
mockFs({
|
||||
'package.json': JSON.stringify({
|
||||
name: 'a',
|
||||
configSchema: {
|
||||
type: 'object',
|
||||
properties: {
|
||||
other: {
|
||||
required: ['x a'],
|
||||
type: 'object',
|
||||
properties: {
|
||||
'x a': { type: 'number', visibility: 'frontend' },
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
},
|
||||
}),
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const schema = await loadConfigSchema({
|
||||
packagePaths: ['package.json'],
|
||||
dependencies: [],
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Errors about required values should also be filtered like the rest
|
||||
expect(() =>
|
||||
schema.process([{ data: { other: {} }, context: 'test' }], {
|
||||
visibility: ['frontend'],
|
||||
}),
|
||||
).toThrow(
|
||||
"Config should have required property 'x a' { missingProperty=x a } at /other",
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -17,8 +17,9 @@
|
||||
import { AppConfig, JsonObject } from '@backstage/config';
|
||||
import { compileConfigSchemas } from './compile';
|
||||
import { collectConfigSchemas } from './collect';
|
||||
import { filterByVisibility } from './filtering';
|
||||
import { filterByVisibility, filterErrorsByVisibility } from './filtering';
|
||||
import {
|
||||
ValidationError,
|
||||
ConfigSchema,
|
||||
ConfigSchemaPackageEntry,
|
||||
CONFIG_VISIBILITIES,
|
||||
@@ -34,6 +35,18 @@ export type LoadConfigSchemaOptions =
|
||||
serialized: JsonObject;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
function errorsToError(errors: ValidationError[]): Error {
|
||||
const messages = errors.map(({ dataPath, message, params }) => {
|
||||
const paramStr = Object.entries(params)
|
||||
.map(([name, value]) => `${name}=${value}`)
|
||||
.join(' ');
|
||||
return `Config ${message || ''} { ${paramStr} } at ${dataPath}`;
|
||||
});
|
||||
const error = new Error(`Config validation failed, ${messages.join('; ')}`);
|
||||
(error as any).messages = messages;
|
||||
return error;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Loads config schema for a Backstage instance.
|
||||
*
|
||||
@@ -67,12 +80,15 @@ export async function loadConfigSchema(
|
||||
{ visibility, valueTransform, withFilteredKeys } = {},
|
||||
): AppConfig[] {
|
||||
const result = validate(configs);
|
||||
if (result.errors) {
|
||||
const error = new Error(
|
||||
`Config validation failed, ${result.errors.join('; ')}`,
|
||||
);
|
||||
(error as any).messages = result.errors;
|
||||
throw error;
|
||||
|
||||
const visibleErrors = filterErrorsByVisibility(
|
||||
result.errors,
|
||||
visibility,
|
||||
result.visibilityByDataPath,
|
||||
result.visibilityBySchemaPath,
|
||||
);
|
||||
if (visibleErrors.length > 0) {
|
||||
throw errorsToError(visibleErrors);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let processedConfigs = configs;
|
||||
@@ -83,7 +99,7 @@ export async function loadConfigSchema(
|
||||
...filterByVisibility(
|
||||
data,
|
||||
visibility,
|
||||
result.visibilityByPath,
|
||||
result.visibilityByDataPath,
|
||||
valueTransform,
|
||||
withFilteredKeys,
|
||||
),
|
||||
@@ -94,7 +110,7 @@ export async function loadConfigSchema(
|
||||
...filterByVisibility(
|
||||
data,
|
||||
Array.from(CONFIG_VISIBILITIES),
|
||||
result.visibilityByPath,
|
||||
result.visibilityByDataPath,
|
||||
valueTransform,
|
||||
withFilteredKeys,
|
||||
),
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -50,7 +50,14 @@ export const DEFAULT_CONFIG_VISIBILITY: ConfigVisibility = 'backend';
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* An explanation of a configuration validation error.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
type ValidationError = string;
|
||||
export type ValidationError = {
|
||||
keyword: string;
|
||||
dataPath: string;
|
||||
schemaPath: string;
|
||||
params: Record<string, any>;
|
||||
propertyName?: string;
|
||||
message?: string;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* The result of validating configuration data using a schema.
|
||||
@@ -65,7 +72,14 @@ type ValidationResult = {
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The path in the key uses the form `/<key>/<sub-key>/<array-index>/<leaf-key>`
|
||||
*/
|
||||
visibilityByPath: Map<string, ConfigVisibility>;
|
||||
visibilityByDataPath: Map<string, ConfigVisibility>;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* The configuration visibilities that were discovered during validation.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The path in the key uses the form `/properties/<key>/items/additionalProperties/<leaf-key>`
|
||||
*/
|
||||
visibilityBySchemaPath: Map<string, ConfigVisibility>;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user