Fix Backstage case
This commit is contained in:
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ follows:
|
||||
|
||||
_note_ Currently the templaters that we provide are basically Docker action
|
||||
containers that are run on top of the skeleton folder. This keeps dependencies
|
||||
to a minimum for running backstage scaffolder, but you don't _have_ to use
|
||||
to a minimum for running Backstage scaffolder, but you don't _have_ to use
|
||||
Docker. You can `pip install cookiecutter` to run it locally in your backend.
|
||||
You could create your own templater that spins up an EC2 instance and downloads
|
||||
the folder and does everything using an AMI if you want. It's entirely up to
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -39,13 +39,13 @@ internally.
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
After filling in these variables, you'll get some more fields to fill out which
|
||||
are required for backstage usage: the owner (which is a `user` in the backstage
|
||||
are required for Backstage usage: the owner (which is a `user` in the backstage
|
||||
system), the `storePath` (which right now must be a GitHub Organisation or
|
||||
GitHub user and a non-existing GitHub repository name in the format
|
||||
`organisation/reponame`), and a GitHub team or user account which should be
|
||||
granted admin access to the repository.
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
### Run!
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user