start bep for telemetry service
Signed-off-by: Kurt King <kurtaking@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: Backstage Telemetry Service
|
||||
status: implementable
|
||||
authors:
|
||||
- '@kurtaking'
|
||||
owners:
|
||||
- '@kurtaking'
|
||||
project-areas:
|
||||
- backend
|
||||
- framework
|
||||
creation-date: 2025-06-23
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
**Note:** When your BEP is complete, all these pre-existing comments should be removed
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
# BEP: Backstage Telemetry Service
|
||||
|
||||
- [Summary](#summary)
|
||||
- [Motivation](#motivation)
|
||||
- [Goals](#goals)
|
||||
- [Non-Goals](#non-goals)
|
||||
- [Proposal](#proposal)
|
||||
- [Design Details](#design-details)
|
||||
- [Release Plan](#release-plan)
|
||||
- [Dependencies](#dependencies)
|
||||
- [Alternatives](#alternatives)
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
Add a core telemetry service to Backstage's backend system that provides a unified interface for metrics, tracing, and logging instrumentation. The service would offer OpenTelemetry-based telemetry capabilities with zero configuration defaults while allowing extensibility through plugin modules.
|
||||
|
||||
## Motivation
|
||||
|
||||
While individual plugins may implement their own metrics or tracing, there's no unified service that provides a standardized approach for telemetry and observability. This gap makes it difficult for operators to monitor Backstage deployments effectively and for plugin developers to add observability to their plugins consistently.
|
||||
|
||||
### Goals
|
||||
|
||||
- Consistent telemetry patterns across all plugins
|
||||
- Zero-configuration defaults that work out of the box
|
||||
- Extensible architecture for custom telemetry backends
|
||||
- OpenTelemetry integration following industry standards
|
||||
- Performance monitoring capabilities built into the platform
|
||||
|
||||
### Non-Goals
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
This is where we get down to the specifics of what the proposal actually is.
|
||||
This should have enough detail that reviewers can understand exactly what
|
||||
you're proposing, but should not include things like API designs or
|
||||
implementation.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
## Design Details
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
This section should contain enough information that the specifics of your
|
||||
change are understandable. This may include API specs or even code snippets.
|
||||
If there's any ambiguity about HOW your proposal will be implemented, this is the place to discuss them.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
## Release Plan
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
This section should describe the rollout process for any new features. It must take our version policies into account and plan for a phased rollout if this change affects any existing stable APIs.
|
||||
|
||||
If there is any particular feedback to be gathered during the rollout, this should be described here as well.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
## Dependencies
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
List any dependencies that this work has on other BEPs or features.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
## Alternatives
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
What other approaches did you consider, and why did you rule them out? These do
|
||||
not need to be as detailed as the proposal, but should include enough
|
||||
information to express the idea and why it was not acceptable.
|
||||
-->
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user